[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1249312893.7924.108.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:21:33 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: oleg@...hat.com, eranian@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
robert.richter@....com, paulus@...ba.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
mpjohn@...ibm.com, cel@...ibm.com, cjashfor@...ibm.com,
mucci@...s.utk.edu, terpstra@...s.utk.edu,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, mtk.manpages@...glemail.com,
roland@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] fcntl: F_[SG]ETOWN_TID
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 14:11 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>
> > arch/parisc/include/asm/fcntl.h | 2 +
> > fs/fcntl.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > include/asm-generic/fcntl.h | 4 ++
> > include/linux/fs.h | 11 +++++-
> > net/socket.c | 2 +-
>
> OK.
>
>
>
> Alpha has private definitions of F_SETSIG and F_GETSIG which are
> identical to the generic ones. That's somewhat logical, given that
> alpha's F_SETOWN/F_GETOWN _differ_ from the asm-generic ones.
>
> Alpha appears to have made the decision to spell out _all_ the F_*
> flags, given that some of them are different. That has some merit, I
> guess.
>
> But your patch broke that.
Right, all I did was validate that I didn't overlap with any of the
existing fcntl numbers. I can explicitly add them to alpha if that makes
people happy..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists