linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/12] ksm: keep quiet while list empty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:55:18 +0300
From:	Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
CC:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/12] ksm: keep quiet while list empty

Hugh Dickins wrote:
> ksm_scan_thread already sleeps in wait_event_interruptible until setting
> ksm_run activates it; but if there's nothing on its list to look at, i.e.
> nobody has yet said madvise MADV_MERGEABLE, it's a shame to be clocking
> up system time and full_scans: ksmd_should_run added to check that too.
>
> And move the mutex_lock out around it: the new counts showed that when
> ksm_run is stopped, a little work often got done afterwards, because it
> had been read before taking the mutex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>
> ---
>
>  mm/ksm.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> --- ksm4/mm/ksm.c	2009-08-02 13:49:59.000000000 +0100
> +++ ksm5/mm/ksm.c	2009-08-02 13:50:07.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1287,21 +1287,27 @@ static void ksm_do_scan(unsigned int sca
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static int ksmd_should_run(void)
> +{
> +	return (ksm_run & KSM_RUN_MERGE) && !list_empty(&ksm_mm_head.mm_list);
> +}
> +
>  static int ksm_scan_thread(void *nothing)
>  {
>  	set_user_nice(current, 5);
>  
>  	while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
> -		if (ksm_run & KSM_RUN_MERGE) {
> -			mutex_lock(&ksm_thread_mutex);
> +		mutex_lock(&ksm_thread_mutex);
> +		if (ksmd_should_run())
>  			ksm_do_scan(ksm_thread_pages_to_scan);
> -			mutex_unlock(&ksm_thread_mutex);
> +		mutex_unlock(&ksm_thread_mutex);
> +
> +		if (ksmd_should_run()) {
>  			schedule_timeout_interruptible(
>  				msecs_to_jiffies(ksm_thread_sleep_millisecs));
>  		} else {
>  			wait_event_interruptible(ksm_thread_wait,
> -					(ksm_run & KSM_RUN_MERGE) ||
> -					kthread_should_stop());
> +				ksmd_should_run() || kthread_should_stop());
>  		}
>  	}
>  	return 0;
> @@ -1346,10 +1352,16 @@ int ksm_madvise(struct vm_area_struct *v
>  
>  int __ksm_enter(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  {
> -	struct mm_slot *mm_slot = alloc_mm_slot();
> +	struct mm_slot *mm_slot;
> +	int needs_wakeup;
> +
> +	mm_slot = alloc_mm_slot();
>  	if (!mm_slot)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	/* Check ksm_run too?  Would need tighter locking */
> +	needs_wakeup = list_empty(&ksm_mm_head.mm_list);
> +
>  	spin_lock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
>  	insert_to_mm_slots_hash(mm, mm_slot);
>  	/*
> @@ -1361,6 +1373,10 @@ int __ksm_enter(struct mm_struct *mm)
>  	spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
>  
>  	set_bit(MMF_VM_MERGEABLE, &mm->flags);
> +
> +	if (needs_wakeup)
> +		wake_up_interruptible(&ksm_thread_wait);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>   
ACK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/