[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aec7e5c30908022015u4ec2489ex49bad474893c66f3@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:15:13 +0900
From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Converting to dev_pm_ops (remove annoying warnings)
Hi Ben!
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Ben Dooks<ben-linux@...ff.org> wrote:
> I have a couple of questions about changing drivers to use the
> dev_pm_ops method within drivers using the device driver model.
>
> 1) Should the suspend/resume code still be wrapped in #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> and supply a NULL 'struct dev_pm_ops' wen CONFIG_PM=n
>
> 2) Is it allowable to submit changes to move drivers to dev_pm_ops
> during the -rc phase, or do we have to wait for the merge window
> before sending these? The number of warnings on a system that
> relies heavily on platform devices is annoying (S3C24XX ARM).
To begin with: I'm the one to blame for the annoying printouts. If
people dislike the printout then I'm all for disabling it later on in
the -rc phase. As you understand the goal is to motivate people to
update their drivers. =)
I'm not the right person to answer the merge policy question, but
wouldn't it be good to submit patches regardless of when they will be
picked up? OTOH, I guess knowing when helps if you have a bunch of
other changes queued up for your drivers though...
Any thoughts?
Cheers,
/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists