[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1249328851.18161.32.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:47:31 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
parisc-linux@...ts.parisc-linux.org, Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: Re: nfs: __setup_str_nfs_root_setup causes a section type conflict
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 21:21 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 03 August 2009, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> > > > /home/fjp/projects/kernel/linux-2.6/fs/nfs/nfsroot.c:403:
> > > > error: __setup_str_nfs_root_setup causes a section type
> > > > conflict
> >
> > If you do a 'make fs/nfs/nfsroot.i', and then look at the resulting
> > file fs/nfs/nfsroot.i, what does the line that defines
> > '__setup_str_nfs_root_setup' look like?
>
> $ grep __setup_str_nfs_root_setup fs/nfs/nfsroot.i
>
> static const char __setup_str_nfs_root_setup[] __attribute__
> ((__section__(".init.rodata"))) __attribute__((aligned(1))) = "nfsroot=";
> static struct obs_kernel_param __setup_nfs_root_setup
> __attribute__((__used__)) __attribute__ ((__section__(".init.setup")))
> __attribute__((aligned((sizeof(long))))) = { __setup_str_nfs_root_setup,
> nfs_root_setup, 0 };
Yup. That matches what I get on an x86_64 platform, where it appears to
compile without any trouble. I can see no reason why it shouldn't
compile on parisc too. In fact you should have tons of these in
init/do_mounts.c: do they generate compile errors too?
Cheers
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists