linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v13

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090803202848.GS12579@kernel.dk>
Date:	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:28:48 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To:	Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	chris.mason@...cle.com, david@...morbit.com, hch@...radead.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz,
	yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com, richard@....demon.co.uk,
	fweisbec@...il.com, Alan.Brunelle@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v13

On Mon, Aug 03 2009, Damien Wyart wrote:
> > > fs/sync.c has changed some time ago and I think your patch needs this
> > > (which I had lazyly added by hand in v12 without telling):
> 
> > > --- a/fs/sync.c	2009-07-31 07:32:08.927926281 +0200
> > > +++ b/fs/sync.c	2009-07-31 07:31:52.499801359 +0200
> > > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ restart:
> > >   */
> > >  SYSCALL_DEFINE0(sync)
> > >  {
> > > -	wakeup_pdflush(0);
> > > +	wakeup_flusher_threads(0);
> > >  	sync_filesystems(0);
> > >  	sync_filesystems(1);
> > >  	if (unlikely(laptop_mode))
> 
> * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> [2009-07-31 09:15]:
> > Argh, I had fixed that long ago, but a branch problem yesterday caused
> > it to be lost just before posting. How annoying. Thanks for the hint,
> > I'll update the v13 branch and patch.
> 
> Mmm. I wanted to test v13 on another machine and re-downloaded the patch
> this morning (Paris time) but it seems completly wrong. It applied
> cleany but I did not even try to compile as the files changed seemed
> completely unrelated to per-bdi writeback. I guess there has been an
> error in generating it.

Probably I diffed two wrong branches when updating the patch. I've
re-uploaded a newly generated diff.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/