[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908040848.27364.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:48:26 +0930
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: rr tree build failure
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:52:27 am Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sunday 02 August 2009 09:32:03 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Rusty,
> >
> > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/acpi/osl.c: In function 'bind_to_cpu0':
> > drivers/acpi/osl.c:194: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_cpus_allowed'
> >
> > Caused by commit 74b5820808215f65b70b05a099d6d3c969b82689 ("ACPI: bind
> > workqueues to CPU 0 to avoid SMI corruption") (from the acpi tree but now
> > in Linus' tree) interacting with commit
> > 17e249fb40c814a72f08c1356cb47ec9f87f81a8
> > ("cpumask:remove-set_cpus_allowed") from the rr tree.
> >
> > I have reverted that rr tree commit for today.
>
> Here's a patch to fix this. Since Linus' tree still contains instances
> of set_cpus_allowed(), I'm guessing this patch should be added to the rr
> tree?
>
> Bjorn
Yep, my series removes it, at least for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y.
Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists