linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:44:00 -0400
From:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: cpufreq tree build failure

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 01:22:14AM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
 > On Monday 03 August 2009 04:28:19 am Stephen Rothwell wrote:
 > > Hi Dave,
 > >
 > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
 > >
 > > ERROR: "cpufreq_global_kobject" [drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.ko]
 > > undefined!
 > >
 > > Caused by commit 35b104d88338e5eddb36c670fea4752f6c10c82f ("[CPUFREQ]
 > > ondemand - Use global sysfs dir for tuning settings").  Presumably
 > > cpufreq_global_kobject needs an EXPORT_SYMBOL.
 > 
 > Yep, that's it. Below is a fix.
 > 
 > Thanks a lot,

I'll roll this in with the previous patch, so as not to introduce
a bisect-regression, and rebase the tree. Will push something out
soon.

thanks.

	Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/