linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -mm] introduce tracehook_finish

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090803235306.GA6821@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 01:53:06 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, utrace-devel@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] introduce tracehook_finish_jctl() helper

On 08/01, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> > Confused.  This patch has no effect.
>
> Indeed, the three patches changing do_signal_stop() have no immediate
> material effect.  They all just clean up the code and prepare the hooks
> that utrace (or something like it) needs to make tracing stops mesh well
> with job control stops.  I'd thought it might be simpler for review to just
> roll these three together and send you a single patch to replace
> signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch; but Oleg decided to keep it
> sliced smaller.

But let me repeat, I would be happy if these 2 new patches are folded
into signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/