[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A78099B.4@parrot.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:12:43 +0200
From: Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@...rot.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
CC: "ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca" <ltt-dev@...ts.casi.polymtl.ca>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: Tracing thread name
Hi Mathieu,
Mathieu Desnoyers a écrit :
> * Matthieu CASTET (matthieu.castet@...rot.com) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I use ltt on a 2.6.27 on an arm architecture.
>> It works quite well, but I have a minor problem :
>>
>> my application sets thread name with prctl PR_SET_NAME. But ltt viewer
>> doesn't seem to saw it.
>>
>
> Hrm, I guess we might want to instrument set_task_comm as you propose to
> get the correct process name, but if this gets us the thread name, I
> think it's only an implementation side-effect:
> The way LTTng handles thread names is by adding a userspace "thread
> branding" event. It should be executed at thread startup. The downside
> of the current LTTng approach is that we cannot know the name of threads
> already executing before we started tracing.
>
Do you know if it is possible to patch my version to add such feature ?
I saw that the name already change in the trace before/after an exec.
How lltv get the new name ?
With "fs.exec" tracepoint ?
In that case I could fake a "fs.exec" tracepoint in set_task_comm.
Thanks
Matthieu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists