[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908041239.18238.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:39:17 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>, sandeen@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
sandeen@...deen.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/compat_ioctl.c: add missing FS_IOC_FIEMAP support
On Tuesday 04 August 2009, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Well, whichever of the two works best for the maintainers.
> >
> > We need something for it upstream, and probably back in -stable too.
> > Otherwise this prevents using 64-bit kernels on 32-bit userland,
> > as Linus likes to recommend so often. ;)
>
> OK, here's what I have, with a somewhat reworked changelog.
>
> I assumed that "Josef" == josef@...hat.com.
>
> Arnd, could you please check that it still looks OK?
Yes, it looks ok as well. The #include is not needed here,
and the difference in compat_sys_ioctl() is that with Eric's
patch, a file system or device driver could in theory implement
its own compat handler for FS_IOC_FIEMAP while it cannot do
that for the native ioctl.
I would like to keep the logic in compat_sys_ioctl in sync with
do_vfs_ioctl, but they have diverged already. I have an experimental
patch set to rework compat_ioctl handling that will also take care
of this.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists