linux-kernel - Re: Ang: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <OFC7025845.8BE60C98-ONC1257608.0051D318-C1257608.00525388@transmode.se>
Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:59:13 +0200
From:	Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
To:	avorontsov@...mvista.com
Cc:	dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: Ang: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Setting GPIOs simultaneously

Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com> wrote on 04/08/2009 16:22:50:
>
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 03:38:40PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com> wrote on 15/07/2009 00:09:31:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 11:20:13PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > >But any users of the legacy bindings should be in-tree.
> > > >
> > > > ehh, it was working until you made it OF only. Why do call the native
> > > > way legacy?  It is the method all non OF arch uses.
> > >
> > > It's legacy because there are no in-tree users anymore. Nowadays
> > > we're trying to pass all needed information via OF, and we're
> > > trying to avoid ugly platform-dependant hacks. Your SPI scheme
> > > can be easily described via OF, but sure, it's hard to implement
> > > it with the current SPI/OF subsystem.
> >
> > Sorry for the long delay, I have been on vaction and been busy with other stuff.
> >
> > Tell me, how does this new OF SPI device scheme work out if you want
> > to use the bitbanged SPI driver?
>
> spi-controller {
>    ...
>    compatible = "generic-bitbang-spi";
>    gpios = <GPIO_CLK GPIO_MOSI GPIO_MISO>;
>    spi,chip-select-machines = <&gpio_csm &board_csm>;
>
>    gpio_csm: chip-select-machine {
>       #address-cells = <1>;
>       #size-cells = <0>;
>       compatible = "generic-gpio-csm";
>       gpios = <GPIO_CS1 GPIO_CS2>;
>
>       touchscreen@0 {
>          reg = <0>; /* using GPIO CS1 */
>       };
>
>       eeprom@1 {
>          reg = <1>; /* using GPIO CS2 */
>       };
>    };
> };
>
> localbus {
>    ...
>    board_csm: chip-select-machine {
>       #address-cells = <1>;
>       #size-cells = <0>;
>       compatibe = "board-specific-csm";
>
>       light-sensor@0 {
>          reg = <0>; /* using board-specific "CS3" */
>       };
>
>       battery@1 {
>          reg = <1>; /* using board-specific "CS4" */
>       };
>    };
> };

hmm, this looks promising. Can I write my own board-specific-csm
and attach it to the SPI CS engine? I don't quite
se how, the 8xxx SPI driver only looks for gpio functions.
Perhaps this is something that you are working on?

       Jocke

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/