[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090804194746.33bea2d0@skybase>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:47:46 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
johnstul@...ibm.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/core] timers: Cache __next_timer_interrupt result
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:16:04 GMT
tip-bot for Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> Commit-ID: 91ff44bdb806a3d26436cc4f5e4816d1ea75b34b
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/91ff44bdb806a3d26436cc4f5e4816d1ea75b34b
> Author: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
> AuthorDate: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:25:05 +0200
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> CommitDate: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:07:51 +0200
>
> timers: Cache __next_timer_interrupt result
Seeing that patch again after a few days and all of a sudden I find the
bugs .. I really should use time_before and time_before_eq instead of
comparing the expires values directly. New patch:
--
Subject: [PATCH] cache __next_timer_interrupt result
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Each time a cpu goes to sleep on a NOHZ=y system the timer wheel is
searched for the next timer interrupt. It can take quite a few cycles
to find the next pending timer. This patch adds a field to tvec_base
that caches the result of __next_timer_interrupt. The hit ratio is
around 80% on my thinkpad under normal use, on a server I've seen
hit ratios from 5% to 95% dependent on the workload.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
---
kernel/timer.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -urpN linux-2.6/kernel/timer.c linux-2.6-patched/kernel/timer.c
--- linux-2.6/kernel/timer.c 2009-08-04 19:45:03.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6-patched/kernel/timer.c 2009-08-04 19:45:19.000000000 +0200
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct tvec_base {
spinlock_t lock;
struct timer_list *running_timer;
unsigned long timer_jiffies;
+ unsigned long next_timer;
struct tvec_root tv1;
struct tvec tv2;
struct tvec tv3;
@@ -622,6 +623,9 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, un
if (timer_pending(timer)) {
detach_timer(timer, 0);
+ if (timer->expires == base->next_timer &&
+ !tbase_get_deferrable(timer->base))
+ base->next_timer = base->timer_jiffies;
ret = 1;
} else {
if (pending_only)
@@ -663,6 +667,9 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, un
}
timer->expires = expires;
+ if (time_before(timer->expires, base->next_timer) &&
+ !tbase_get_deferrable(timer->base))
+ base->next_timer = timer->expires;
internal_add_timer(base, timer);
out_unlock:
@@ -781,6 +788,9 @@ void add_timer_on(struct timer_list *tim
spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock, flags);
timer_set_base(timer, base);
debug_timer_activate(timer);
+ if (time_before(timer->expires, base->next_timer) &&
+ !tbase_get_deferrable(timer->base))
+ base->next_timer = timer->expires;
internal_add_timer(base, timer);
/*
* Check whether the other CPU is idle and needs to be
@@ -817,6 +827,9 @@ int del_timer(struct timer_list *timer)
base = lock_timer_base(timer, &flags);
if (timer_pending(timer)) {
detach_timer(timer, 1);
+ if (timer->expires == base->next_timer &&
+ !tbase_get_deferrable(timer->base))
+ base->next_timer = base->timer_jiffies;
ret = 1;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock, flags);
@@ -850,6 +863,9 @@ int try_to_del_timer_sync(struct timer_l
ret = 0;
if (timer_pending(timer)) {
detach_timer(timer, 1);
+ if (timer->expires == base->next_timer &&
+ !tbase_get_deferrable(timer->base))
+ base->next_timer = base->timer_jiffies;
ret = 1;
}
out:
@@ -1134,7 +1150,9 @@ unsigned long get_next_timer_interrupt(u
unsigned long expires;
spin_lock(&base->lock);
- expires = __next_timer_interrupt(base);
+ if (time_before_eq(base->next_timer, base->timer_jiffies))
+ base->next_timer = __next_timer_interrupt(base);
+ expires = base->next_timer;
spin_unlock(&base->lock);
if (time_before_eq(expires, now))
@@ -1523,6 +1541,7 @@ static int __cpuinit init_timers_cpu(int
INIT_LIST_HEAD(base->tv1.vec + j);
base->timer_jiffies = jiffies;
+ base->next_timer = base->timer_jiffies;
return 0;
}
@@ -1535,6 +1554,9 @@ static void migrate_timer_list(struct tv
timer = list_first_entry(head, struct timer_list, entry);
detach_timer(timer, 0);
timer_set_base(timer, new_base);
+ if (time_before(timer->expires, new_base->next_timer) &&
+ !tbase_get_deferrable(timer->base))
+ new_base->next_timer = timer->expires;
internal_add_timer(new_base, timer);
}
}
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists