lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908041418370.21700@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 14:19:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	John Reiser <jreiser@...wagon.com>
cc:	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ftrace: __start_mcount_loc should be .init.rodata



On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, John Reiser wrote:

> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, John Reiser wrote:
> > 
> >> __start_mcount_loc[] is unused after init, yet occupies RAM forever
> >> as part of .rodata.  152kiB is typical on a 64-bit architecture.  Instead,
> >> __start_mcount_loc should be in the interval [__init_begin, __init_end)
> >> so that the space is reclaimed after init.
> > 
> > Are you sure about that?
> 
> Data follows from a direct A<->B comparison.
> 
> My .config is same as Fedora Project, except for CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y.
> ----- /var/log/messages
> ftrace: allocating 18889 entries ...
> 	    # 18889 * 8 = 151112 bytes (147kiB) for __start_mcount_loc[]
> 		on 64-bit architecture
> -----
> 
> With MCOUNT_REC() in original RO_DATA in include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h:
> ===================================
> ----- /var/log/messages
> kernel: Freeing initrd memory: 3134k freed
> kernel: debug: unmapping init memory ffffffff8163d000..ffffffff81783000
> 	## The only message about unmapping;  length is 0x146000 or 1335296 bytes
> kernel: Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1844k   ## 148kiB more than later
> -----
> 
> ----- System.map
> ffffffff8155c850 R __start_mcount_loc  # below unmapped range
> ffffffff81581698 R __stop_mcount_loc
> -----
> 
> ----- "readelf --sections vmlinux" has these "\.init" strings:
>   [12] __init_rodata     PROGBITS         ffffffff8155c850  0075c850  # _below_ unmapped range
>   [15] .init.rodata      PROGBITS         ffffffff815f01c0  007f01c0  # _below_ unmapped range
>   [25] .data.init_task   PROGBITS         ffffffff81612000  00a12000
>   [28] .init.text        PROGBITS         ffffffff8163d000  00a3d000  # low end of unmapped range
>   [29] .init.data        PROGBITS         ffffffff81675620  00a75620
>   [30] .init.setup       PROGBITS         ffffffff8175d980  00b5d980
>   [31] .initcall.init    PROGBITS         ffffffff8175eca0  00b5eca0
>   [33] .x86_cpu_dev.init PROGBITS         ffffffff8175fa00  00b5fa00
>   [39] .init.ramfs       PROGBITS         ffffffff81776000  00b76000  # still in unmapped range
>    01     .data .init.rodata .data.cacheline_aligned .data.read_mostly
> ## Note that .init.rodata is in segment 1, with .data
>    03     .data.init_task .data.page_aligned .smp_locks .init.text .init.data .init.setup .initcall.init .con_initcall.init .x86_cpu_dev.init .secu
> rity_initcall.init .parainstructions .altinstructions .altinstr_replacement .exit.text .init.ramfs .data.percpu .data_nosave .bss
> ## Note that .init.text and .init.data are in segment 3
> -----
> 
> 
> With MCOUNT_REC() moved to INIT_DATA as patched to include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h:
> ==================================
> ----- /var/log/messages:
> kernel: Freeing initrd memory: 3134k freed
> kernel: debug: unmapping init memory ffffffff81619000..ffffffff81784000
> 	## The only message about unmapping;  length is 0x16b000 or 1486848 bytes
> kernel: Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 1696k   ## 148kiB less than before
> -----
> 
> ----- System.map
> ffffffff816a28d0 T __start_mcount_loc  # within unmapped range
> ffffffff816c7718 T __stop_mcount_loc
> -----
> 
> ----- "readelf --sections vmlinux" has these "\.init" strings:
>   [14] .init.rodata      PROGBITS         ffffffff815cb1c0  007cb1c0  # _below_ unmapped range
>   [24] .data.init_task   PROGBITS         ffffffff815ee000  009ee000
>   [27] .init.text        PROGBITS         ffffffff81619000  00a19000  # low end of unmapped range
>   [28] .init.data        PROGBITS         ffffffff81651620  00a51620
>   [29] .init.setup       PROGBITS         ffffffff8175e7c0  00b5e7c0
>   [30] .initcall.init    PROGBITS         ffffffff8175fae0  00b5fae0
>   [32] .x86_cpu_dev.init PROGBITS         ffffffff81760840  00b60840
>   [38] .init.ramfs       PROGBITS         ffffffff81777000  00b77000  # still in unmapped range
>    01     .data .init.rodata .data.cacheline_aligned .data.read_mostly
>    03     .data.init_task .data.page_aligned .smp_locks .init.text .init.data .init.setup .initcall.init .con_initcall.init .x86_cpu_dev.init .secu
> rity_initcall.init .parainstructions .altinstructions .altinstr_replacement .exit.text .init.ramfs .data.percpu .data_nosave .bss
> -----
> 
> Perusing the source:
> arch/x86/mm/init_64.c: free_init_pages() called from
>    ./arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:		free_init_pages("SMP alternatives",
>    ./arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:	free_init_pages("unused kernel memory",
>    ./arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:	free_init_pages("initrd memory", start, end);
> All other calls also are architecture-specific and in other architectures,
> and also are similar to these.
> 
> 
> >> @@ -331,7 +332,6 @@
> >>  	/* __*init sections */						\
> >>  	__init_rodata : AT(ADDR(__init_rodata) - LOAD_OFFSET) {		\
> > 
> > Isn't this in __init_rodata? Doesn't this get removed too?
> 
> In my vmlinux it is _not_ removed; it is with .rodata, not .init.rodata
> (and not .init.data), and is outside (below) the removed range.

Thanks for this detailed explanation, I'll pull your patch in an run it 
through my tests, and then push it off.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ