linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] Makes procs file writable to move all threads by tgid at once

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6599ad830908041148h6d3f3e9bxfef9f3eedec0ab6d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:48:57 -0700
From:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To:	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Benjamin Blum <bblum@...gle.com>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Makes procs file writable to move all threads by tgid 
	at once

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Serge E. Hallyn<serue@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> This is probably a stupid idea, but...  what about having zero
> overhead at clone(), and instead, at cgroup_task_migrate(),
> dequeue_task()ing all of the affected threads for the duration of
> the migrate?
>

Or a simpler alternative - rather than taking the thread group
leader's rwsem in cgroup_fork(), always take current's rwsem. Then
you're always locking a (probably?) local rwsem and minimizing the
overhead. So not quite zero overhead in the fork path, but I'd be
surprised if it was measurable. In cgroup_attach_proc() you then have
to take the rwsem of every thread in the process. Kind of the
equivalent of a per-threadgroup big-reader lock.

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/