linux-kernel - [PATCH 5/6] KEYS: Make /proc/keys use keyid not numread as file position [ver #2]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090804203943.25094.68091.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:39:44 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jmorris@...ei.org
Cc:	serue@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] KEYS: Make /proc/keys use keyid not numread as file
	position [ver #2]

From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>

Make the file position maintained by /proc/keys represent the ID of the key
just read rather than the number of keys read.  This should make it faster to
perform a lookup as we don't have to scan the key ID tree from the beginning to
find the current position.

Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---

 security/keys/proc.c |   62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)


diff --git a/security/keys/proc.c b/security/keys/proc.c
index 769f9bd..643ecf0 100644
--- a/security/keys/proc.c
+++ b/security/keys/proc.c
@@ -91,8 +91,9 @@ __initcall(key_proc_init);
  */
 #ifdef CONFIG_KEYS_DEBUG_PROC_KEYS
 
-static struct rb_node *__key_serial_next(struct rb_node *n)
+static struct rb_node *key_serial_next(struct rb_node *n)
 {
+	n = rb_next(n);
 	while (n) {
 		struct key *key = rb_entry(n, struct key, serial_node);
 		if (key->user->user_ns == current_user_ns())
@@ -102,45 +103,64 @@ static struct rb_node *__key_serial_next(struct rb_node *n)
 	return n;
 }
 
-static struct rb_node *key_serial_next(struct rb_node *n)
+static int proc_keys_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
-	return __key_serial_next(rb_next(n));
+	return seq_open(file, &proc_keys_ops);
 }
 
-static struct rb_node *key_serial_first(struct rb_root *r)
+static struct key *find_ge_key(key_serial_t id)
 {
-	struct rb_node *n = rb_first(r);
-	return __key_serial_next(n);
-}
+	struct rb_node *n = key_serial_tree.rb_node;
+	struct key *minkey = NULL;
 
-static int proc_keys_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
-	return seq_open(file, &proc_keys_ops);
+	while (n) {
+		struct key *key = rb_entry(n, struct key, serial_node);
+		if (id < key->serial) {
+			if (!minkey || minkey->serial > key->serial)
+				minkey = key;
+			n = n->rb_left;
+		} else if (id > key->serial) {
+			n = n->rb_right;
+		} else {
+			minkey = key;
+			break;
+		}
+		key = NULL;
+	}
 
+	return minkey;
 }
 
 static void *proc_keys_start(struct seq_file *p, loff_t *_pos)
 {
-	struct rb_node *_p;
-	loff_t pos = *_pos;
+	key_serial_t pos = *_pos;
+	struct key *key;
 
 	spin_lock(&key_serial_lock);
 
-	_p = key_serial_first(&key_serial_tree);
-	while (pos > 0 && _p) {
-		pos--;
-		_p = key_serial_next(_p);
-	}
-
-	return _p;
+	if (*_pos > INT_MAX)
+		return NULL;
+	key = find_ge_key(pos);
+	if (!key)
+		return NULL;
+	*_pos = key->serial;
+	return &key->serial_node;
+}
 
+static inline key_serial_t key_node_serial(struct rb_node *n)
+{
+	struct key *key = rb_entry(n, struct key, serial_node);
+	return key->serial;
 }
 
 static void *proc_keys_next(struct seq_file *p, void *v, loff_t *_pos)
 {
-	(*_pos)++;
-	return key_serial_next((struct rb_node *) v);
+	struct rb_node *n;
 
+	n = key_serial_next(v);
+	if (n)
+		*_pos = key_node_serial(n);
+	return n;
 }
 
 static void proc_keys_stop(struct seq_file *p, void *v)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/