[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090804040834.GA16696@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:08:34 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...l.by>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: proper tty-ldisc refcounting (was Re: WARNING at:
drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c)
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:53:19PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 05:56:07PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > >
> > > Works for me (SMP/non-SMP x86 builds). Great job.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...l.by>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Greg - feel free to treat 4/2 and 5/2 any way you want. They are obvious
> > enough (no subtle issues) that I'll happily pull them into 2.6.31 too:
> > relative to the initial refcount changes (which it looks like we'll need
> > to do just to fix the regression) they are pretty safe.
> >
> > But at the same time, they can equally well go into some later tree for
> > the next merge window. So whatever you want to do.
>
> I'll queue them up for .32 as they don't fix a bug that people are
> hitting from what I can tell.
Oh wait, the original problem, single user mode. Hm, we need all of
these to fix that problem? Or just the first one?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists