linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] Add support for LZO-compressed kernels

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:00:43 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	sam@...nborg.org, hpa@...or.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	alain@...ff.lu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, albin.tonnerre@...e-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] Add support for LZO-compressed kernels

On Mon,  3 Aug 2009 16:58:18 +0200
Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@...e-electrons.com> wrote:

> This is the first part of the lzo patch
> The lzo compressor is worse than gzip at compression, but faster at
> extraction. Here are some figures for an ARM board I'm working on:
> 
> Uncompressed size: 3.24Mo
> gzip  1.61Mo 0.72s
> lzo   1.75Mo 0.48s
> 
> So for a compression ratio that is still relatively close to gzip, it's
> much faster to extract, at least in that case.

Is 3.2Mb a typical kernel size for small systems?  It sounds large.


0.24 seconds booting speedup sounds pretty thin.  Adding a new
decompression format will introduce more configuration/build/deployment
complexities.  How do we justify this?

Did anyone look into just speeding up the gzip decompressor?

> +#ifdef STATIC

What is this STATIC thing for?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/