linux-kernel - [PATCH -rt] Fix build error with !CONFIG_PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1249428652.3289.19.camel@localhost>
Date:	Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:30:52 -0700
From:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH -rt] Fix build error with !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT

Hey Thomas, Ingo,
	Here's a small build fix to get !CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT +
CONFIG_PREEMPT_HARDIRQS to build. Not sure why this change was
introduced between 2.6.29-rt and 2.6.31-rt, but this sets it back.

Tested with and without CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT and with and without
CONFIG_PREEMPT_HARDIRQS.

Signed-off-by: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>

Index: 2.6.31-rc4-rt1/include/linux/bottom_half.h
===================================================================
--- 2.6.31-rc4-rt1.orig/include/linux/bottom_half.h	2009-08-04 16:14:13.000000000 -0700
+++ 2.6.31-rc4-rt1/include/linux/bottom_half.h	2009-08-04 16:14:25.000000000 -0700
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #ifndef _LINUX_BH_H
 #define _LINUX_BH_H
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_HARDIRQS
 # define local_bh_disable()		do { } while (0)
 # define __local_bh_disable(ip)		do { } while (0)
 # define _local_bh_enable()		do { } while (0)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/