[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090804074510.GA22900@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:45:10 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: joerg.roedel@....com, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp,
reif@...thlink.net, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] sparc: use asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h and
pci-dma-compat.h
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 07:56:08 +0200
>
> > I'm wondering how sparc32 handles core_kernel_text() & friends?
> >
> > Those functions already assume that the bits between _stext and
> > _etext are all core kernel text and not generic pages freed back
> > to the buddy.
>
> They won't work for such pages obviously. Shows how many sparc32
> users who trigger this case of actually freeing those pages and
> using such facilities there actually are :-)
:)
I suspect the other bit is probably that core_kernel_text() really
didnt use to have any critical use at all - just debugging/lockdep
mostly. So no functionality broke for people to report.
Such bugs often have years of latency on x86 too - we recently fixed
one that was there for over a year and nobody noticed:
4a44bac: symbols, stacktrace: look up init symbols after module symbols
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists