[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A7988F0.2010208@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:28:16 +0300
From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 5
On 08/05/2009 01:13 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Boaz,
>
> On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:11:20 +0300 Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 08/05/2009 10:23 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> This tree fails to build for powerpc allyesconfig (final link problem).
>>
>> Above is reported for a long time. Is it related to this:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg921978.html
>
> No, it is this:
>
> powerpc-linux-ld: TOC section size exceeds 64k
>
> It is powerpc specific and the only way we can think of fixing it
> involves stopping building the built-in.o files and linking the entire
> kernel in one go at the end. We just haven't had time (or the energy) to
> try to fix it properly while it only affects the final link of the
> allyesconfig kernel.
>
Ha, OK allyesconfig. Last time I attempted an allyesconfig for i386 I got
me the OOM killer attack on my KDE, half way into the final link.
That's why I use allmodconfig for when I need "try to compile everything ++"
I get just as much compilation coverage if not more. And is faster.
It'll not show symbol conflicts if any exist, though.
Thanks
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists