[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1249484030.7512.42.camel@dhcp-100-19-198.bos.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:53:50 -0400
From: Larry Woodman <lwoodman@...hat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] tracing, page-allocator: Add a postprocessing
script for page-allocator-related ftrace events
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 21:48 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >
>
> Adding and deleting tracepoints, rebuilding and rebooting the kernel is
> obviously usable by developers but not a whole pile of use if
> recompiling the kernel is not an option or you're trying to debug a
> difficult-to-reproduce-but-is-happening-now type of problem.
>
> Of the CC list, I believe Larry Woodman has the most experience with
> these sort of problems in the field so I'm hoping he'll make some sort
> of comment.
>
I am all for adding tracepoints that eliminate the need to locate a
problem, add debug code, rebuild, reboot and retest until the real
problem is found.
Personally I have not seen as many problems in the page allocator as I
have in the page reclaim code thats why the majority of my tracepoints
were in vmscan.c However I do ACK this patch set because it provides
the opportunity to zoom into the page allocator dynamically without
needing to iterate through the cumbersome debug process.
Larry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists