[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090805184500.GO13236@buzzloop.caiaq.de>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:45:00 +0200
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Ville Syrjala <syrjala@....fi>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] w1_gpio: switch to new dev_pm_ops
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 08:44:01PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > +static struct dev_pm_ops w1_gpio_pm_ops = {
> > + .suspend = w1_gpio_suspend,
> > + .freeze = w1_gpio_suspend,
> > + .resume = w1_gpio_resume,
> > + .thaw = w1_gpio_resume,
>
> You need
>
> + .poweroff = w1_gpio_suspend,
> + .restore = w1_gpio_resume,
>
> in addition to these, which seems to be the case with the rest of the patches
> too.
>
> If you wait for a little while with the patchset, we're going to have a
> convenience macro for defining such 'standard' dev_pm_ops objects.
Ok, fine. Letting them all point the same function looks somwhat hackish
to me, so I'll wait for that macro. Let me know when that has arrived :)
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists