[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908031921.23126.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:21:22 -0700
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] spi: Add support for device table matching
On Wednesday 29 July 2009, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > struct spi_driver {
> > + const struct spi_device_id *id_table;
> > + int (*probe_id)(struct spi_device *spi,
> > + const struct spi_device_id *id);
>
> how about leaving it at just probe and have either a call or a field
> in the device that you can look at to see if this was a new style of
> call?
>
> > int (*probe)(struct spi_device *spi);
For the record, if this is going to happen I think the
appropriate long-term solution is to have probe() take
the device_id just as it does with other busses.
Of course that involves changing *every* SPI driver...
and I'd rather not do that quite yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists