[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0908060857230.6643@tundra.namei.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:59:25 +1000 (EST)
From: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: torvalds@...l.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KEYS: Make /proc/keys use keyid not numread as file
position [ver #2]
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009, David Howells wrote:
> From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
>
> Make the file position maintained by /proc/keys represent the ID of the key
> just read rather than the number of keys read. This should make it faster to
> perform a lookup as we don't have to scan the key ID tree from the beginning to
> find the current position.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
This does not apply to my tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/security-testing-2.6#next
Looks like it's due to pending changes in the same file. Could you please
generate this patch against my tree?
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists