linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add SIMPLE_PM_OPS: make switching to dev_pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090805045533.C3574526EA5@mailhub.coreip.homeip.net>
Date:	Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:55:33 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SIMPLE_PM_OPS: make switching to dev_pm_ops less
	error-prone

On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 11:36:12AM +0200, Albin Tonnerre wrote:
> In a number of cases, the .suspend, .freeze, .poweroff and .resume,
> .thaw, .restore functions are identical. However, they all need to be
> assigned to avoid regressionsm as the previous code called .suspend
> resp. .resume in all those cases. SIMPLE_PM_OPS allows to deal with
> this case.
> 

I'd much rather have conversions done with a bit more analysis now that
our framework is more flexible and we can have specialized routines for
hibernation and suspend.

Maybe we should try changing from run-time to build time warning so that
users are not overly concerned with it?

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/