linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pci/intr_remapping: allocate irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A7A2FB1.9050407@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 05 Aug 2009 18:19:45 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci/intr_remapping: allocate irq_iommu on node

Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 02:14 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> without this patch
>>
>> [  299.175436] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
>> [  299.180009] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: using 64bit DMA mask
>> [  299.183077] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: using 64bit consistent DMA mask
>> [  299.199870] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: enabling bus mastering
>> [  299.205534] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: setting latency timer to 64
>> [  299.219654] reserve_memtype added 0xcfc00000-0xcfc04000, track uncached-minus, req uncached-minus, ret uncached-minus
>> [  299.239615] reserve_memtype added 0xcfc20000-0xcfc21000, track uncached-minus, req uncached-minus, ret uncached-minus
>> [  299.260181]   alloc irq_desc for 217 on node 2
>> [  299.263501]   alloc kstat_irqs on node 2
>> [  299.276276] alloc irq_2_iommu on node 0
>> [  299.281847] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: irq 217 for MSI/MSI-X
>> [  299.285511]   alloc irq_desc for 218 on node 2
>> [  299.297813]   alloc kstat_irqs on node 2
>> [  299.302543] alloc irq_2_iommu on node 0
>> [  299.315358] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: irq 218 for MSI/MSI-X
>> [  299.321102]   alloc irq_desc for 219 on node 2
>> [  299.325932]   alloc kstat_irqs on node 2
>> [  299.338616] alloc irq_2_iommu on node 0
>> [  299.340789] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: irq 219 for MSI/MSI-X
>> [  299.356532] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: PF still in reset state, assigning new address
>> [  299.365128] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: PF still resetting
>> [  299.377625] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: Intel(R) 82576 Virtual Function
>> [  299.385619] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: Address: c6:e3:de:62:de:eb
>> [  299.395957] igbvf 0000:41:10.0: MAC: 1
>>
>> thought we could put irq_2_iommu to same node too.
> 
> Yinghai, even with this patch, we will still be allocating from node-0.
> No?

with this patch will get 
alloc irq_2_iommu on node 2

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/