[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A7A35A0.4040707@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:45:04 +0800
From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/7] x86: implement crashkernel=auto
Neil Horman wrote:
> What about all the other arches that support kexec? ia64/ppc[64]/s390/etc?
> Don't they need an implementation of arch_default_crash_size? Or perhaps better
> still you should put this definition in asm-generic, so that it can be
> overridden per-arch if need be, but you always have something to fall back on.
>
Hmm, I think you mean we need ARCH_HAS_XXXX....
OK, it is a good idea, I will try it.
Thanks for your review, Neil.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists