linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 4/5] input: gpio-keys: switch to new dev_pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908061719.44068.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:19:43 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
Cc:	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...il.com>,
	Phil Blundell <pb@...dhelds.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 4/5] input: gpio-keys: switch to new dev_pm_ops

On Thursday 06 August 2009, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 02:51:55AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 August 2009, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:15:52PM +0200, pHilipp Zabel wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Daniel Mack<daniel@...aq.de> wrote:
> > > > > -static int gpio_keys_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > > +static int gpio_keys_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > > >  {
> > > > > -       struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > > > > +       struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
> > > > >        int i;
> > > > >
> > > > > -       if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) {
> > > > > +       if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
> > > > >                for (i = 0; i < pdata->nbuttons; i++) {
> > > > >                        struct gpio_keys_button *button = &pdata->buttons[i];
> > > > >                        if (button->wakeup) {
> > > > > @@ -251,19 +251,27 @@ static int gpio_keys_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > >
> > > > >        return 0;
> > > > >  }
> > > > > +
> > > > > +static struct dev_pm_ops gpio_keys_pm_ops = {
> > > > > +       .suspend        = gpio_keys_suspend,
> > > > > +       .freeze         = gpio_keys_suspend,
> > > > > +       .resume         = gpio_keys_resume,
> > > > > +       .thaw           = gpio_keys_resume,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm not sure I understand hibernation correctly, but isn't
> > > > .freeze/.thaw about saving state and halting/resuming the device
> > > > operation only?
> > 
> > It is.
> > 
> > > > It seems to me that enabling system wakeup functionality should go
> > > > into .poweroff. (See <linux/pm.h>)
> > 
> > That's correct.
> > 
> > And .restore() plays the role of ".resume() from hibernation".
> 
> Hence, In case of this driver which only calls disable_irq/enable_irq,
> setting .poweroff and .restore seems to suffice?

I'll have a look at the driver.  Still, it seems .suspend and .resume should be
set too, shouldn't they?

> From afa35cebccf49a24613e711afb8009fb6aadce0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 15:28:54 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] input: gpio-keys: switch to new dev_pm_ops
> 
> The callbacks for the implemented functions are .poweroff and .restore,
> as they only care for {dis,en}able_irq(). Renamed the functions
> to reflect that.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <daniel@...aq.de>
> Cc: Phil Blundell <pb@...dhelds.org>
> Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
> index efed0c9..8e670d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c
> @@ -216,12 +216,12 @@ static int __devexit gpio_keys_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> -static int gpio_keys_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> +static int gpio_keys_poweroff(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +	struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) {
> +	if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < pdata->nbuttons; i++) {
>  			struct gpio_keys_button *button = &pdata->buttons[i];
>  			if (button->wakeup) {
> @@ -234,12 +234,12 @@ static int gpio_keys_suspend(struct platform_device *pdev, pm_message_t state)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int gpio_keys_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int gpio_keys_restore(struct device *dev)
>  {
> -	struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +	struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) {
> +	if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) {
>  		for (i = 0; i < pdata->nbuttons; i++) {
>  			struct gpio_keys_button *button = &pdata->buttons[i];
>  			if (button->wakeup) {
> @@ -251,19 +251,25 @@ static int gpio_keys_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +static struct dev_pm_ops gpio_keys_pm_ops = {
> +	.poweroff	= gpio_keys_poweroff,
> +	.restore	= gpio_keys_restore,

Should .suspend and .resume really be NULL?

> +};
> +
> +#define GPIO_KEYS_PM_OPS (&gpio_keys_pm_ops)
> +
>  #else
> -#define gpio_keys_suspend	NULL
> -#define gpio_keys_resume	NULL
> +#define GPIO_KEYS_PM_OPS NULL
>  #endif
>  
>  static struct platform_driver gpio_keys_device_driver = {
>  	.probe		= gpio_keys_probe,
>  	.remove		= __devexit_p(gpio_keys_remove),
> -	.suspend	= gpio_keys_suspend,
> -	.resume		= gpio_keys_resume,
>  	.driver		= {
>  		.name	= "gpio-keys",
>  		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
> +		.pm	= GPIO_KEYS_PM_OPS,
>  	}
>  };

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/