lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:40:01 +0100
From:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
	David John <davidjon@...ontk.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Erik Mouw <mouw@...linux.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@...r.kernel.org" to ARM
	sections

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 09:18:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 16:03 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 07:23:34AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 14:33 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:02:10AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > > I suspect a vger based ARM list would not require you to "run" it.
> > > > There is already a vger based ARM list.  I see no signs of people
> > > > moving over to it.  I summise that is because most people don't
> > > > have a problem, and most people are happy with the existing lists
> > > > as they stand.  Could it be that it's only a minority who are
> > > > having issues.  I don't know.
> > > 
> > > Perhaps there is too little exposure of the
> > > linux-arm@...r.kernel.org mailing list.
> > 
> > I'm not subscribed, please do not add any of the samsung entries
> > with linux-arm@...r.kernel.org list.
> 
> Perhaps this patch is more palatable.  It's certainly shorter.
> 
> It does add both linux-arm-kernel and linux-arm to section
> SIMTEC EB2410ITX (BAST).  By the way, another section you
> maintain, SIMTEC EB110ATX (Chalice CATS), has neither a
> pattern entry nor a mailing list entry.  Should it?

I recently had to remove those pattern entries because they were plainly
wrong (thanks to those who didn't CC anyone in the ARM community with
those patches.)  EB110ATX != EBSA110.  See ce53895.

I had asked the maintainer of that platform to submit a patch to add the
correct entries.  Rather than having plainly bogus entries in there,
let's have either nothing or the right entries.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ