[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090806174433.GG7198@alberich.amd.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:44:33 +0200
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: use zalloc_cpumask_var instead of alloc/clear
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:15:52PM +0200, Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 06:30:46PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrea,
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:48:11 +0200 Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com> wrote:
> > >
> > > @@ -1061,8 +1070,10 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
> > > for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> > > alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > alloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i));
> > > + cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i));
> >
> > I noticed this in linux-next ... you can use zalloc_cpumask_var() instead
> > of alloc_cpumask_var() followed by cpumask_clear().
>
> I know, there is a collision with a patch in linux-next that replaced
> alloc_cpumask_var/cpumask_clear with the zalloc version.
>
> (a) Either that patch should be adapted to change also the new allocation.
> (b) I can also change all those allocation to zalloc with my patch.
>
> Make your choice:
>
> [ ] (a)
> [ ] (b)
My choice is
[X] (c) Do this in a separate patch.
See below.
Regards,
Andreas
--
>From 5d7e6138d4bc2d8c5191e6bf9cfbe9d5a27d79b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:31:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] x86, smpboot: use zalloc_cpumask_var instead of alloc/clear
Suggested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 12 ++++--------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index f50af56..f797214 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -1068,14 +1068,10 @@ void __init native_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
#endif
current_thread_info()->cpu = 0; /* needed? */
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
- alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
- alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
- alloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
- alloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map, GFP_KERNEL);
- cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i));
- cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i));
- cpumask_clear(per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i));
- cpumask_clear(cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map);
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_sibling_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_core_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpu_node_map, i), GFP_KERNEL);
+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_data(i).llc_shared_map, GFP_KERNEL);
}
set_cpu_sibling_map(0);
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists