lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090806025105.GA7077@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:21:05 +0530
From:	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Add diagnostic check for a possible
	CPU-hotplug race

On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 06:26:45PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 05:56:18AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:04:58AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > i've attached the full serial bootlog with the warning in it. This 
> > > should address your question about what the order of initialization 
> > > is, right?
> > 
> > It does, thank you!  This problem really is happening during boot.
> > 
> > > Let me know if you still would like me to run your diagnostic patch 
> > > too.
> > 
> > Now that you mention it, you should probably let me test it a bit first.
> 
> And here is a tested and debugged version.  Diagnostic only, not for
> inclusion, based on tip/core/rcu as of today (August 5th).
> 
> Gautham, have you been able to reproduce on your machines?  Still cannot
> here.

I tried on a couple of machines yesterday, but I still couldn't
reproduce it with Ingo's config.

> 
> 							Thanx, Paul
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Create an rcu_cpu_notified() API that checks to see whether RCU's
> CPU-hotplug notifier is registered.  This is used in three WARN_ON_ONCE()
> calls, the first of which should trigger, and the second two of
> which should not -- but I suspect that the WARN_ON_ONCE() located in
> __rcu_process_callbacks() will in fact trigger on the machine suffering
> from this bug.  ;-)
> 
> Any code path that executes after rcu_init() should have RCU CPU-hotplug
> notifiers registered, so any triggering of the following WARN_ON_ONCE()
> after rcu_init() is a bug:
> 
> 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_cpu_notified());
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  include/linux/cpu.h      |    3 +++
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h |    1 +
>  kernel/cpu.c             |    5 +++++
>  kernel/notifier.c        |   23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/rcupdate.c        |    9 ++++++++-
>  kernel/rcutree.c         |    1 +
>  6 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
> index 4d668e0..d9b3c18 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ struct notifier_block;
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>  extern int register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
>  extern void unregister_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb);
> +extern int cpu_notified(int (*fn)(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long, void *));
> +extern int raw_notifier_chain_is_registered(struct raw_notifier_head *nh,
> +		int (*fn)(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long, void *));
>  #else
> 
>  #ifndef MODULE
> diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> index 3c89d6a..f790f3c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ extern void rcu_init(void);
>  extern void rcu_scheduler_starting(void);
>  extern int rcu_needs_cpu(int cpu);
>  extern int rcu_scheduler_active;
> +extern int rcu_cpu_notified(void);
> 
>  #if defined(CONFIG_TREE_RCU)
>  #include <linux/rcutree.h>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 8ce1004..5aa736a 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,11 @@ int __ref register_cpu_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb)
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> +int cpu_notified(int (*fn)(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long, void *))
> +{
> +	return raw_notifier_chain_is_registered(&cpu_chain, fn);
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> 
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_cpu_notifier);
> diff --git a/kernel/notifier.c b/kernel/notifier.c
> index 61d5aa5..d72c0b8 100644
> --- a/kernel/notifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/notifier.c
> @@ -59,6 +59,29 @@ static int notifier_chain_unregister(struct notifier_block **nl,
>  	return -ENOENT;
>  }
> 
> +static int notifier_chain_is_registered(struct notifier_block *nl,
> +		int (*fn)(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long, void *))
> +{
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	/* printk(KERN_ALERT "notifier_chain_is_registered looking for: %pS\n", fn); */
> +	while (nl != NULL) {
> +		/* printk(KERN_ALERT "notifier_chain_is_registered: %pS\n", rcu_dereference(nl)->notifier_call); */
> +		if (rcu_dereference(nl)->notifier_call == fn) {
> +			rcu_read_unlock();
> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +		nl = (rcu_dereference(nl)->next);
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int raw_notifier_chain_is_registered(struct raw_notifier_head *nh,
> +		int (*fn)(struct notifier_block *, unsigned long, void *))
> +{
> +	return notifier_chain_is_registered(nh->head, fn);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * notifier_call_chain - Informs the registered notifiers about an event.
>   *	@nl:		Pointer to head of the blocking notifier chain
> diff --git a/kernel/rcupdate.c b/kernel/rcupdate.c
> index 9f0584e..57a4626 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcupdate.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcupdate.c
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void rcu_migrate_callback(struct rcu_head *notused)
>  extern int rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
>  			  unsigned long action, void *hcpu);
> 
> -static int __cpuinit rcu_barrier_cpu_hotplug(struct notifier_block *self,
> +int __cpuinit rcu_barrier_cpu_hotplug(struct notifier_block *self,
>  		unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
>  {
>  	rcu_cpu_notify(self, action, hcpu);
> @@ -246,12 +246,19 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_barrier_cpu_hotplug(struct notifier_block *self,
>  	return NOTIFY_OK;
>  }
> 
> +int rcu_cpu_notified(void)
> +{
> +	return cpu_notified(rcu_barrier_cpu_hotplug);
> +}
> +
>  void __init rcu_init(void)
>  {
>  	int i;
> 
>  	__rcu_init();
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_cpu_notified()); /* this one expected to trigger. */
>  	hotcpu_notifier(rcu_barrier_cpu_hotplug, 0);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_cpu_notified());
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * We don't need protection against CPU-hotplug here because
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index b9b1928..a0bfc93 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -1133,6 +1133,7 @@ __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
>  	unsigned long flags;
> 
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->beenonline == 0);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_cpu_notified());
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * If an RCU GP has gone long enough, go check for dyntick

-- 
Thanks and Regards
gautham
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ