[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090806032603.GD25478@erda.amd.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 05:26:04 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perfcounter fixes
On 04.08.09 21:18:32, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Linus,
>
> Please pull the latest perfcounters-fixes-for-linus git tree from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git perfcounters-fixes-for-linus
>
> Note, i was unsure about this commit:
>
> f265426: perf_counter: Set the CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS default to y if CONFIG_PROFILING=y
>
> Is it proper to offer up a default-y if CONFIG_PROFILING is set to y
> already and default-off otherwise?
>
> I kept this the last commit so we can zap it easily if it's not ok.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
> ------------------>
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (1):
> perf top: Add mwait_idle_with_hints to skip_symbols[]
>
> Ingo Molnar (2):
> perf_counter tools: Fix link errors with older toolchains
> perf_counter: Set the CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS default to y if CONFIG_PROFILING=y
Setting CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS=y per default for -rc6? Wouldn't this be
something for the next merge window? Give people the chance to test
this, changing default configurations shouln't be made this late in
the release cycle.
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@....com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists