[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A7A52EF.503@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 11:50:07 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] tracing/filters: Provide support for char *
pointers
>> How about add __field_type()? So we can define:
>>
>> __field_type(char *, str, FILTER_PTR_STR)
>>
>> the advantage is he who wrote the code really knows this field is safe
>> to be used in filtering as a string.
>>
>> I had some patches that does similar job. I can rewrite and post them.
>
> Ah good idea. That may even be useful for further typedef'ed types which
> filter process match existing supported types.
>
That's why I wrote those patches, to allow:
# dev is type dev_t
echo "dev == 8:0" > filter
# callsite is void *
echo "callsite == kfree_skb" > filter
> Just one neat however: __field_type looks too much ambiguous. __field() is
> already here to define a typed field. This seems confusing.
>
> Why not __field_ext() for "extended"? We may probably add more flags
> than FILTER_PTR_STR in the future to define options for filtering or even
> for larger scope.
>
Sure. You know I'm not good at naming. ;)
> I then wait for your patches to be posted and I'll integrate them in the
> current queue.
>
Will soon be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists