[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-1bbf20835c4e088667a090ce6523a0f70b62dc76@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 03:51:57 GMT
From: tip-bot for Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...hat.com, johnstul@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
peterz@...radead.org, dino@...ibm.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/urgent] rtmutex: Avoid deadlock in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock()
Commit-ID: 1bbf20835c4e088667a090ce6523a0f70b62dc76
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/1bbf20835c4e088667a090ce6523a0f70b62dc76
Author: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:05:21 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 05:50:21 +0200
rtmutex: Avoid deadlock in rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock()
In the event of a lock steal or owner died,
rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() will give the rt_mutex to the
waiting task, but it fails to release the wait_lock. This leads
to subsequent deadlocks when other tasks try to acquire the
rt_mutex.
I also removed a few extra blank lines that really spaced this
routine out. I must have been high on the \n when I wrote this
originally...
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@...ibm.com>
Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
LKML-Reference: <4A79D7F1.4000405@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/rtmutex.c | 4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c
index fcd107a..29bd4ba 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c
@@ -1039,16 +1039,14 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
if (!rt_mutex_owner(lock) || try_to_steal_lock(lock, task)) {
/* We got the lock for task. */
debug_rt_mutex_lock(lock);
-
rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, task, 0);
-
+ spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_lock(lock, task);
return 1;
}
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock);
-
if (ret && !waiter->task) {
/*
* Reset the return value. We might have
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists