[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19066.28054.65288.171564@notabene.brown>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:43:50 +1000
From: Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.31rc5 RAID10 lockdep report - sysfs_nofity_dirent locking
issue
On Tuesday August 4, gregkh@...e.de wrote:
> >
> > Greg: does that look right? If so I'll add a changelog entry and
> > submit it properly (after at least a compile test...)
>
> Yes, it looks correct, if it passes your tests :)
Thanks.
I've tested it and documented it now and so am happy to submit it.
Thanks,
NeilBrown
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 15:42:08 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Allow sysfs_notify_dirent to be called from interrupt context.
sysfs_notify_dirent is a simple atomic operation that can be used to
alert user-space that new data can be read from a sysfs attribute.
Unfortunately is cannot currently be called from non-process context
because of it's use of spin_lock which is sometimes taken with
interrupt enabled.
So change all lockers of sysfs_open_dirent_lock to disable interrupts,
thus making sysfs_notify_dirent safe to be called from non-process
context (as drivers/md does in md_safemode_timeout).
sysfs_get_open_dirent is (documented as being) only called from
process context, so it uses spin_lock_irq. Other places
use spin_lock_irqsave.
The usage for sysfs_notify_dirent in md_safemode_timeout was
introduced in 2.6.28, so this patch is suitable for that and more
recent kernels.
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
---
fs/sysfs/file.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/sysfs/file.c b/fs/sysfs/file.c
index 561a9c0..f5ea468 100644
--- a/fs/sysfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/sysfs/file.c
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ static int sysfs_get_open_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd,
struct sysfs_open_dirent *od, *new_od = NULL;
retry:
- spin_lock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
if (!sd->s_attr.open && new_od) {
sd->s_attr.open = new_od;
@@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static int sysfs_get_open_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd,
list_add_tail(&buffer->list, &od->buffers);
}
- spin_unlock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
if (od) {
kfree(new_od);
@@ -315,8 +315,9 @@ static void sysfs_put_open_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd,
struct sysfs_buffer *buffer)
{
struct sysfs_open_dirent *od = sd->s_attr.open;
+ unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock, flags);
list_del(&buffer->list);
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&od->refcnt))
@@ -324,7 +325,7 @@ static void sysfs_put_open_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd,
else
od = NULL;
- spin_unlock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock, flags);
kfree(od);
}
@@ -456,8 +457,9 @@ static unsigned int sysfs_poll(struct file *filp, poll_table *wait)
void sysfs_notify_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd)
{
struct sysfs_open_dirent *od;
+ unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock, flags);
od = sd->s_attr.open;
if (od) {
@@ -465,7 +467,7 @@ void sysfs_notify_dirent(struct sysfs_dirent *sd)
wake_up_interruptible(&od->poll);
}
- spin_unlock(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sysfs_open_dirent_lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sysfs_notify_dirent);
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists