linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix reading of perf.data file header

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090807074525.GA20292@elte.hu>
Date:	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:45:25 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, paulus@...ba.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix reading of perf.data file header


* Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Ok, there's indeed a flag clash with -s/--sort as you noticed.
> >
> > -S looks good to me, how about going one step further and changing 
> > perf record to use -S/--stat as well, to make the flag consistent 
> > across all tools?
> 
> Sure, but perf stat already uses -S for --scale :)

heh :-)

I completely forgot about it. And since we now have --scale enabled 
by default (and it doesnt make much sense to disable it i guess), it 
would not be a big issue to rename that -c/--scale to free up that 
flag for -S/--stat?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/