[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090807080811.GA18343@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:08:11 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: David Xiao <dxiao@...adcom.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
v4l2_linux <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: How to efficiently handle DMA and cache on ARMv7 ? (was "Is
get_user_pages() enough to prevent pages from being swapped out ?")
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 10:59:26PM -0700, David Xiao wrote:
> The V7 speculative prefetching will then probably apply to DMA coherency
> issue in general, both kernel and user space DMAs. Could this be
> addressed by inside the dma_unmap_sg/single() calling dma_cache_maint()
> when the direction is DMA_FROM_DEVICE/DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL, to basically
> invalidate the related cache lines in case any filled by prefetching?
> Assuming dma_unmap_sg/single() is called after each DMA operation is
> completed.
It's something that I was going to look at, and it's probably going to
have to be something I do blind - I currently have no MPCore platform,
and even if my Realview EB worked, it doesn't use DMA at all.
However, it's not trivial - the unmap functions don't have all the
necessary information. dma_unmap_single() has the DMA address, which
we can convert to the original virtual address via dma_to_virt().
However, dma_unmap_page() can't translate back to a virtual page
since we're missing some information there.
It bugs me that the DMA API is restrictive in the information which
architectures can retain across a mapping which makes this non-trivial.
Had I known of these issues when the DMA API was originally being
discussed, I'd have suggested that we have an arch-specific dma_map
struct which could contain whatever information was required, rather
than requiring the driver to maintain the handle/size/direction/etc
between each of the calls. That would mean we could retain the virtual
address/struct page rather than having to work it back in some way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists