linux-kernel - Re: [bisected] boot speed regression in current git

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A7C0FB8.8040304@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 07 Aug 2009 13:27:52 +0200
From:	Henk Martijn <h.h.martijn@...il.com>
To:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jpirko@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [bisected] boot speed regression in current git

Frans Pop wrote:
>> I bisected this to "net: restore the original spinlock to protect
>> unicast list" commit: a6ac65db2329e7685299666f5f7b6093c7b0f3a0
>> reverting this commit gives me back 20 s in boot time.
> 
> Try adding this patch from Ingo. It will probably fix the issue:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124945666109347&w=2
> 
> Cheers,
> FJP
> 
Jep, Ingo's patch fixed it. 

Thanks!

/Henk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/