linux-kernel - perf-record fix and UI improvement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1249647361-11582-1-git-send-email-pierre.habouzit@intersec.com>
Date:	Fri,  7 Aug 2009 14:15:59 +0200
From:	Pierre Habouzit <pierre.habouzit@...ersec.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: perf-record fix and UI improvement

While toying with perf, I've noticed that perf record can easily enter
a busy loop when doing something as silly as:

    $ perf record -A ls

I've searched why and here are the patches:

 [PATCH 1/2] perf util: do_read should fail on EOF instead of busy-looping.

   Yeah, do_read here really wants to read a known size, not being able
   to should die(), not busy-lopp ;)
   That was the cause for the bug.

 [PATCH 2/2] perf-record: improve -A UI for empty or non-existent perf.data

   Though with 1/2 `git record -A ls` would then fail miserably with
   some kind of "cannot read" error, which sucks. So this patch
   understands -A as a "append or create if file is empty or inexistant"

   This fact may deserve to be documented properly, if so just tell me
   I'll send an updated patch for Documentation/

I'm kind of new to the kernel world, so I hope I sent the patches to the
proper persons.
-- 
Intersec <http://www.intersec.com>
Pierre Habouzit <pierre.habouzit@...ersec.com>
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/