[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1249650066.32113.706.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 15:01:06 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Pierre Habouzit <pierre.habouzit@...ersec.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: perf-record fix and UI improvement
On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 14:15 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> While toying with perf, I've noticed that perf record can easily enter
> a busy loop when doing something as silly as:
>
> $ perf record -A ls
>
> I've searched why and here are the patches:
>
> [PATCH 1/2] perf util: do_read should fail on EOF instead of busy-looping.
>
> Yeah, do_read here really wants to read a known size, not being able
> to should die(), not busy-lopp ;)
> That was the cause for the bug.
>
>
> [PATCH 2/2] perf-record: improve -A UI for empty or non-existent perf.data
>
> Though with 1/2 `git record -A ls` would then fail miserably with
> some kind of "cannot read" error, which sucks. So this patch
> understands -A as a "append or create if file is empty or inexistant"
>
> This fact may deserve to be documented properly, if so just tell me
> I'll send an updated patch for Documentation/
>
>
> I'm kind of new to the kernel world, so I hope I sent the patches to the
> proper persons.
You did well for a first time ;-)
The things you can improve for next time are:
- placing these nice descriptions you made above into the patches
themselves, as esp the first patch has an empty changelog.
- get your email right :-)
Anyway, I think Ingo already fixed that up for you, so
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists