linux-kernel - [PATCH 6/8] x86, mcheck: Make use of cpu_node_mask instead of cpu_core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090807130415.GY6520@alberich.amd.com>
Date:	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:04:15 +0200
From:	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>,
	Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@...ia.fr>
Subject: [PATCH 6/8] x86, mcheck: Make use of cpu_node_mask instead of
	cpu_core_mask

This fixes threshold_bank4 support on multi-node processors.

We need to create 2 sets of symlinks for sibling shared banks -- one
set for each internal node, symlinks of each set should target the
first core on same internal node.

Currently only one set is created where all symlinks are targeting
the first core of the entire socket.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
index ddae216..595cbe5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce_amd.c
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ static __cpuinit int threshold_create_bank(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	if (cpu_data(cpu).cpu_core_id && shared_bank[bank]) {	/* symlink */
-		i = cpumask_first(cpu_core_mask(cpu));
+		i = cpumask_first(cpu_node_mask(cpu));
 
 		/* first core not up yet */
 		if (cpu_data(i).cpu_core_id)
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static __cpuinit int threshold_create_bank(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank)
 		if (err)
 			goto out;
 
-		cpumask_copy(b->cpus, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
+		cpumask_copy(b->cpus, cpu_node_mask(cpu));
 		per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank] = b;
 
 		goto out;
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static __cpuinit int threshold_create_bank(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int bank)
 #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
 	cpumask_setall(b->cpus);
 #else
-	cpumask_copy(b->cpus, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
+	cpumask_copy(b->cpus, cpu_node_mask(cpu));
 #endif
 
 	per_cpu(threshold_banks, cpu)[bank] = b;
-- 
1.6.3.3



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/