[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090807131501.GD2763@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:15:01 -0500
From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@...il.com>
Cc: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
David Xiao <dxiao@...adcom.com>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk>,
Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
v4l2_linux <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: How to efficiently handle DMA and cache on ARMv7 ? (was "Is
get_user_pages() enough to prevent pages from being swapped out ?")
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:07:43PM +0200, Laurent Desnogues wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Jamie Lokier<jamie@...reable.org> wrote:
> >
> > 1. Does the architecture not prevent speculative instruction
> > prefetches from crossing a page boundary? It would be handy under the
> > circumstances.
>
> There's no such restriction in ARMv7 architecture.
Doesn't it prevent them for uncached areas? I _THOUGHT_ there was an
alloc_consistent (or something like that) call on ARM which gave you
an uncached mapping where you could do DMA. I also thought there was
a dma_* set of functions which remapped as uncached before DMA begins
and remapped as normal after DMA has been completed.
Sorry for the fuzzy recollection. I am dredging from 2.6.21 timeframe.
Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists