linux-kernel - Re: ath5k - strange regulatory domain change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200908071735.33428.elendil@planet.nl>
Date:	Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:35:32 +0200
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	Chris Clayton <chris2553@...glemail.com>
Cc:	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ath5k - strange regulatory domain change

Chris Clayton wrote:
> That's a regression in my book. Oh well! I do have the iw and crda
> applications installed, so I've taken that route of setting the
> regulatory domain to GB.

Somewhere in that thread I pointed to Luis explained that using the 
cfg80211 module parameter is deprecated if you're using those 
applications. So I think that is indeed the correct way to solve it.

If you did not have those applications installed, the GB setting from the 
module parameter would still be honored.

Cheers,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/