[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200908071946.07991.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:46:07 +0200
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] ide: allow ide_dev_read_id() to be called from the IRQ context
On Friday 07 August 2009 19:36:10 David Miller wrote:
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:27:36 +0200
>
> > Are you trying to tell me that after 6 weeks there is still no public
> > tree to hold future IDE changes?
> >
> > If this is indeed a case here I hope that it will get addressed ASAP.
>
> IDE is deep maintainence, we shouldn't be doing lots of changes,
> cleanups, and things of this nature. So urgency and timeliness
> is on a sincerely different scale for it.
Nobody is saying anything about cleanups and things of this nature..
> On the other hand, if you've been looking, I've been applying
> networking patches to net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 by the truckload
> on a daily basis because it is in active development.
Excellence in one area doesn't magically translate to other areas,
especially when said area needs a completely different approach:
I've been looking and I've seen you pushing non-trivial IDE bug-fix
patches with almost no wider hardware coverage to upstream (i.e. one
of my own patches which has been _explicitly_ marked as needing more
linux-next exposure)..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists