[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090807184319.GA22652@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 22:43:19 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben@...ff.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sdhci-devel@...ts.ossman.eu,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] sdhci-of: Fix high-speed cards recognition
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 06:08:59PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > eSDHC fails to recognize some SDHS cards, throwing timeout errors:
> >
> > mmc0: error -110 whilst initialising SD card
> >
> > That's because we calculate timeout value in a wrong way: on eSDHC
> > hosts the timeout clock is derivied from the SD clock, which is set
> > dynamically.
>
> I've seen an reference design for an SDHC controller do this also.
Thanks for the information!
> > +/* Controller has dynamic timeout clock management */
> > +#define SDHCI_QUIRK_DYNAMIC_TIMEOUT_CLOCK (1<<24)
>
> This comment and define would be better if it matched terms used in the
> spec. Suggest:
>
> /* Controller uses SDCLK instead of TMCLK for data timeouts. */
> #define SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK (1 << 24)
Yeah, if it's somewhat common scheme, then it makes sense to name the
quirk that way.
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@...il.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists