[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A7C7CC5.8040306@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:13:09 +0200
From: Bernhard Walle <bernhard.walle@....de>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>, Neil Horman <nhorman@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Bernhard Walle <bwalle@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/7] Implement crashkernel=auto
Eric W. Biederman schrieb:
> Hmm. I half take it back. How is crashkernel=auto and then shrinking
> the reserved size better than the extended syntax Bernhard Walle
> introduced nearly two years ago?
BTW: Ubuntu ships by default with
crashkernel=384M-2G:64M@16M,2G-:128M@16M
What is the complexity for the user? I didn't edit /boot/grub/menu.lst,
I just installed kexec-tools and a few other kdump-related packages, and
then this was in my menu.lst.
Don't make the kernel complex. Make the userspace complex.
Regards,
Bernhard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists