[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090807202105.GB4999@nowhere>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 22:21:06 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perfcounters: Support for ftrace event records sampling
On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 10:09:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 12:38 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > +static void ftrace_profile_##call(proto) \
> > > +{ \
> > > + struct ftrace_data_offsets_##call __maybe_unused __data_offsets;\
> > > + struct ftrace_event_call *event_call = &event_##call; \
> > > + extern void perf_tpcounter_event(int, u64, u64, void *, int); \
> > > + struct ftrace_raw_##call *entry; \
> > > + u64 __addr = 0, __count = 1; \
> > > + unsigned long irq_flags; \
> > > + int __entry_size; \
> > > + int __data_size; \
> > > + int pc; \
> > > + \
> > > + local_save_flags(irq_flags); \
> > > + pc = preempt_count(); \
> > > + \
> > > + __data_size = ftrace_get_offsets_##call(&__data_offsets, args); \
> > > + __entry_size = __data_size + sizeof(*entry); \
> > > + \
> > > + do { \
> > > + char raw_data[__entry_size]; \
> > > + struct trace_entry *ent; \
> > > + \
> > > + entry = (struct ftrace_raw_##call *)raw_data; \
> > > + ent = &entry->ent; \
> > > + tracing_generic_entry_update(ent, irq_flags, pc); \
> > > + ent->type = event_call->id; \
> > > + \
> > > + tstruct \
> > > + \
> > > + { assign; } \
> > > + \
> > > + perf_tpcounter_event(event_call->id, __addr, __count, entry,\
> > > + __entry_size); \
> > > + } while (0); \
> > > + \
> > > +}
> >
> > ok, so the one concern I have here is that the data needs to fit on the
> > stack. What if someone puts a large string in the data?
>
> Also, how NMI safe is all that?
Everything is allocated in the stack. It's NMI safe AFAICS, am I missing
something?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists