lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A7F479D.3070306@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Sun, 09 Aug 2009 15:03:09 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jkacur@...hat.com, johnstul@...ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
	dino@...ibm.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, stable@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/urgent] futex: Update woken requeued futex_q lock_ptr

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * tip-bot for Darren Hart <dvhltc@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> @@ -1030,6 +1034,11 @@ void requeue_pi_wake_futex(struct futex_q *q, union futex_key *key)
>>  	WARN_ON(!q->rt_waiter);
>>  	q->rt_waiter = NULL;
>>  
>> +	q->lock_ptr = &hb->lock;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PI_LIST
>> +	q->list.plist.slock = &hb->lock;
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  	wake_up_state(q->task, TASK_NORMAL);
>>  }
>>  
> 
> -tip testing found a build error with v2 of the patch:
> 
> kernel/futex.c: In function ‘requeue_pi_wake_futex’:
> kernel/futex.c:1039: error: ‘struct plist_head’ has no member named ‘slock’

I've been developing on -rt, and the plist implementation changed with:

34ca9f9b  spinlocks: Create atomic_spinlock and convert rq->lock

Apologies for not catching that.  I'll send out V3 of this patch, one 
for mainline, and one for -rt.  Is prefacing the patch with [RT] the 
preferred way to distinguish mainline and -rt patches?

Thanks,

-- 
Darren Hart
IBM Linux Technology Center
Real-Time Linux Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ