linux-kernel - [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf tools: callchain: Fix bad rounding of minimum rate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <tip-c0a8865e32c8d1a562db38e06ef31ef23282f646@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Sun, 9 Aug 2009 11:12:40 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perfcounters/urgent] perf tools: callchain: Fix bad rounding of minimum rate

Commit-ID:  c0a8865e32c8d1a562db38e06ef31ef23282f646
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/c0a8865e32c8d1a562db38e06ef31ef23282f646
Author:     Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
AuthorDate: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 04:19:15 +0200
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Sun, 9 Aug 2009 13:07:46 +0200

perf tools: callchain: Fix bad rounding of minimum rate

Sometimes we get callchain branches that have a rate under the
limit given by the user.

Say you launched:

 perf record -f -g -a ./hackbench 10
 perf report -g fractal,10.0

And you got:

2.33%       hackbench  [kernel]                  [k] _spin_lock_irqsave
                |
                |--78.57%-- remove_wait_queue
                |          poll_freewait
                |          do_sys_poll
                |          sys_poll
                |          sysenter_dispatch
                |          0xf7ffa430
                |          0x1ffadea3c
                |
                |--7.14%-- __up_read
                |          up_read
                |          do_page_fault
                |          page_fault
                |          0xf7ffa430
                |          0xa0df710000000a
                ...

It is abnormal to get a 7.14% branch whereas we passed a 10%
filter.

The problem is that we round down the minimum threshold. This
happens mostly when we have very low number of events. If the
total amount of your branch is 4 and you have a subranch of 3
events, filtering to 90% will be computed like follows:

  limit = 4 * 0.9;

The result is about 3.6, but the cast to integer will round
down to 3. It means that our filter is actually of 75%

We must then explicitly round up the minimum threshold.

Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: acme@...hat.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: efault@....de
LKML-Reference: <20090809024235.GA10146@...here>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>


---
 tools/perf/util/callchain.c |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
index a8e67aa..0114734 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/callchain.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <stdbool.h>
 #include <errno.h>
+#include <math.h>
 
 #include "callchain.h"
 
@@ -112,7 +113,7 @@ static void __sort_chain_graph_rel(struct callchain_node *node,
 	u64 min_hit;
 
 	node->rb_root = RB_ROOT;
-	min_hit = node->children_hit * min_percent / 100.0;
+	min_hit = ceil(node->children_hit * min_percent);
 
 	chain_for_each_child(child, node) {
 		__sort_chain_graph_rel(child, min_percent);
@@ -126,7 +127,7 @@ static void
 sort_chain_graph_rel(struct rb_root *rb_root, struct callchain_node *chain_root,
 		     u64 min_hit __used, struct callchain_param *param)
 {
-	__sort_chain_graph_rel(chain_root, param->min_percent);
+	__sort_chain_graph_rel(chain_root, param->min_percent / 100.0);
 	rb_root->rb_node = chain_root->rb_root.rb_node;
 }
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/