linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Driver Core: devtmpfs - kernel-maintained tmpfs-based /dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:09:02 +0200
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>, gregkh@...e.de,
	Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>,
	Scott James Remnant <scott@...ntu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver Core: devtmpfs - kernel-maintained tmpfs-based
	/dev

Hi!

> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/base/devtmpfs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,367 @@
> +/*
> + * devtmpfs - kernel-maintained tmpfs-based /dev
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2009, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
> + *

I'd expect GPL notice here...

> +#if defined CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT
> +static int dev_mount = 1;
> +#else
> +static int dev_mount;
> +#endif


A bit too many config options?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_BLOCK
> +static inline int is_blockdev(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	return dev->class == &block_class;
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline int is_blockdev(struct device *dev) { return 0; }

Should this go to header somewhere?

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/